Aiyer: This is the oligarchs' solution for American Education System: Bang for the Buck in Schools. It's not the perceived anti-American stance, or the accusation of being anti-Indian that's the problem; it is the deference to ideology that recasts all facts to support presupposed truths, that rankles. To paraphrase what you said before, the avoidance of
fundas turns us into
goondas (inasmuch as I know that the original references were different, some truths are apparently universal.
Karnam: You are absolutely right. I
don't see why people here are so anti-USA, anti-India, anti-this, anti-that. Universal love, brother...that always works. USA is fantastic, India is fantastic. Dollar was good. Rupee sucked. Now both suck. Just ignore the complainers. If you from India (which you are), you got be able to turn-off the background noise, which is always there in various amplitudes and frequencies. Just listen to the music, nullify the cacophony.
Yehi tho
hai jidagi...(I know you complained when I wrote to you Hindi, but come on
yaar, if one
Injun cant talk to another in Hindustani, what the heck are we doing?)
Lakshman: Give the guy a break - he has just quoted others. Of course, you can give him grief for not expressing an opinion.
Aiyer: That would be like giving Goebbels a break because he was just quoting Hitler. If one purposefully cites quotes in support of an agenda, culpability is clear. As to legitimacy of giving grief for not expressing an opinion ... the opinion has been expressed and is clear, though unstated in this missive, past record of
malignment of American way of life stands. It is not the
malignment of America(
ns) that is offensive (though one wonders as to the motivations), everyone has likes and dislikes and their private reasons for the same ... The misrepresentations being used as a tool to whitewash Indian issues is what gives offense. It is in the interest of India to transparently recognize deficiencies so they may be resolved. Demagogues posturing to minimize them is what piques.
Karnam: There is plenty wrong with the American public school system, (also plenty right in many districts), however "The oligarchy making decisions for public-school kids" and "the schools they impose their policies on" is grossly and outrageously false. As usual, more crap from Mr.
Aiyer.... this is "class-warfare" propaganda of the worst kind, in that it is so blatantly presented on an outrageously false premise. The "oligarchy" cannot impose anything,
nada, zilch, zero, on any public school system. Public school administration is locally managed and administered by locally elected school boards. Oligarch's may have opinions, right or wrong, but have absolutely no say, they don't even have a mechanism to try and have a say.
Lakshman: Why not solve before acknowledging publicly (kind of like not flaunting your dirty wear), then you wont be put on a huge guilt trip? Form a task force-brainstorm and acknowledge privately, then clean up, then acknowledge publicly, whats wrong with this ? I was asked in a public forum this question "
Shouldn't corruption in India be cleaned up before we seek foreign investment" This was in 1990. My answer then as it is now, is that what if we are never able to clean up the endemic corruption in India, then should it become a pariah state, kind of become impoverished like some African states? I
don't think so. The answer then and now, is to tactfully, get rid of
corrupters, while still pretending everything is hunky-dory. Acknowledge all you want, but
don't acknowledge your weakness to a stranger... Otherwise the truth may be hard to bear. what if everyone issues sanctions against India for being "corrupt", and everyone starves?
Aiyer: Then we all agree. The mantra is to bury our heads in the sand. Be happy. Everything will go away.
(distorted from real conversation)